SC: Government employee getting pregnant out of wedlock not immoral

Published by rudy Date posted on January 2, 2008

It is not immoral under the law for a government employee to give birth out of wedlock if she and the father are not married to other people, the Supreme Court has ruled.

The Tribunal said no law punishes an unwed mother for having sex, or prevents consensual sex between two unmarried people.

A distinction should be made between public or secular morality, and religious morality, the court added.

In a decision written by Associate Justice Renato Corona, the SC’s 1st Division dismissed the administrative complaint against Ma. Victoria Radam, a utility worker at the Office of the Clerk of Court, Regional Trial Court of Alaminos City, Pangasinan.

“For a particular conduct to constitute ‘disgraceful and immoral’ behavior under civil service laws, it must be regulated on account of the concerns of public and secular morality,” read the decision.

“It cannot be judged based on personal bias, specifically those colored by particular mores. Respondent was neither confronted with it nor given the chance to explain it.

“To hold her liable for a totally different charge of which she was totally unaware will violate her right to due process.”

The SC said Radam could not be sanctioned because the father of her child was unmarried like her.

“In this case, it was not disputed that, like respondent, the father of her child was unmarried,” read the decision.

“Therefore, respondent cannot be held liable for disgraceful and immoral conduct simply because she gave birth to the child out of wedlock.”

Investigating Judge Elpidio Abella had recommended that Radam be suspended for a month or fined P5,000 for immoral conduct or act unbecoming a court employee.

However, the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) cleared Radam of the immorality charge on grounds that her giving birth out of wedlock did not affect the character or nature of her job as a utility worker.

Nonetheless, the OCA recommended that Radam be fined P5,000 for stating in her child’s birth certificate that the father was unknown to her.

“It may be a not-so-ideal situation and may cause complications for both mother and child but it does not give cause for administrative sanction,” the OCA said.

Chief Justice Reynato Puno, Associate Justices Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez, Adolfo Azcuna, and Teresita de Castro concurred with the ruling.   – Mike Frialde, Philippine Star

March 2025

It’s women’s month!

“Support women every day of the year!”

Invoke Article 33 of the ILO constitution
against the military junta in Myanmar to carry out the 2021 ILO Commission of Inquiry recommendations against serious violations of Forced Labour and Freedom of Association protocols.

Accept National Unity Government
(NUG) of Myanmar.
Reject Military!
#WearMask #WashHands #Distancing #TakePicturesVideos

Time to support & empower survivors.
Time to spark a global conversation.
Time for #GenerationEquality to #orangetheworld!

Monthly Observances:
Women’s Role in History Month

Weekly Observances:
Week 1: Environmental Week
Women’s Week
Week 3: Philippine Industry and Made-in-the-Philippines
Products Week
Last Week: Protection and Gender-Fair Treatment
of the Girl Child Week

Daily Observances:
March 8: Women’s Rights and
International Peace Day;
National Women’s Day
Mar 4— Employee Appreciation Day
Mar 15 — World Consumer Rights Day
Mar 18 — Global Recycling Day
Mar 21 — International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
Mar 23 — International Day for the Right to the Truth concerning Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims
Mar 25 — International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade
Mar 27 — Earth Hour

Trade Union Solidarity Campaigns
Get Email from NTUC
Article Categories