PHILIPPINE Airlines (PAL) on Monday said it won a lawsuit against its former pilot for violating his contractual obligations and training agreement with the country’s flag carrier.
In a statement, PAL said a Regional Trial Court in Makati has ordered pilot Zenon Lukban to pay PAL P1.5-million plus interest, at the rate of 6 percent annually, for the cost of his training at the PAL Aviation School.
In addition, the respondent was held liable to reimburse P1.87 million to PAL, plus interest, for the cost of training his replacement, and P50,000 in attorney’s fees.
The order said one of the conditions of Lukban’s training agreement with PAL required him to serve the flag carrier for five years in exchange for the cost of training shouldered by PAL.
Court records indicate, however, that only two years after completing his training, Lukban, on April 19, 2006, wrote a letter of resignation to chief pilot Capt. Rolly Canlas. His resignation was to take effect on May 20, 2006.
On May 8, 2006, PAL management officially rejected Lukban’s resignation saying this was in violation of his training contract, which was to expire on July 2009.
The agreement also required the pilot to file his notice of resignation 120 days before the intended date of resignation. This requirement has since changed to 180 days after the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration declared the job of pilots and aircraft mechanics as “mission critical skills.”
But since Lukban went absent without official leave immediately after tendering his resignation, administrative and civil cases were pursued by the airline against him.
The regional trial court’s order comes on the heels of PAL’s move to lodge a multimillion-peso damage suits against 27 pilots and first officers who resigned in August 2010 to take higher-paying jobs in the Middle East and elsewhere in Asia.
So far, 16 pilots and first officers are facing charges of abandonment of duty and breach of contract before a Makati trial court.
The abrupt resignations forced PAL, which is currently mired in a labor dispute with its cabin crew and ground unions, to cancel some of its domestic flights in July.
At present, the Department of Labor and Employment assumed jurisdiction over the labor dispute between Philippine Airlines Employees Association and Flight Attendants’ and Stewards’ Association of the Philippines against PAL. –Darwin G. Amojelar Senior Reporter, Manila Times
Invoke Article 33 of the ILO constitution
against the military junta in Myanmar
to carry out the 2021 ILO Commission of Inquiry recommendations
against serious violations of Forced Labour and Freedom of Association protocols.
#WearMask #WashHands
#Distancing
#TakePicturesVideos