One belt one road: implications for ASEAN connectivity

Published by rudy Date posted on April 20, 2018

By ANUSHKA KAPAHI, APRIL 20, 2018

The ASEAN Master Plan for Connectivity (AMPC) and China’s Belt and Road Initiative have major commonalities. Both envisage transport connectivity as a way of bringing countries closer to one another, facilitating better access to trade, investment, tourism and people-to-people exchanges.

Similar to the BRI project, AMPC calls for a system of roads and railways to link contiguous members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations with one another, as well as a system of ports for vessels and short shipping routes to link Southeast Asian countries with one another.

Given this shared vision, it is evident that this would pose a great benefit to developing ASEAN. Also, the Chinese initiative is sure to support the ASEAN nations in advancing regional connectivity.

China has been seeking the advancement of trade and investment with its economic partners. The BRI embodies and projects the reaching-out policy China has embraced. Through this initiative, China aims to trigger the demand for its products by investing intensively on strategic infrastructure projects internationally, developing economic ties along its old Silk Road to Europe and along newer maritime links in and around Asia and as far away as Africa.

Since 2009, China has been ASEAN’s largest trading partner, and since 2011 ASEAN has been China’s third-largest trading partner. Given the vitality of the economic stability of the ASEAN states to China, considering the geographical proximity of the region, a key priority of the BRI is ASEAN’s burgeoning economies. Also, ASEAN is a prominent developing economic partner of China and is a top destination for Chinese businesses and corporations.

The BRI holds a crucial role in bridging ASEAN and China, two of the world’s most dynamic economies. This will also help the growing ASEAN region improve its internal connectivity among the 10 member states by continuously developing their economic zones in Asia and beyond.

The ASEAN member states formed the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) in 2005 and have improved the linking of their economies together. Alongside the AEC, the BRI will further integrate the growing regional community through developing infrastructures in the region and improve its trading policies.

Also, the Chinese initiative will address an infrastructure deficit and support industrial development. The ASEAN region is known to be a fast-growing regional bloc, and will continue to develop economically with strengthened international and regional linkages.

The BRI will also provide a pathway for China to bolster its relations with the ASEAN nations economically. This will also support China’s project of further developing its 20,000-kilometer rail network to deliver technology and services regionally.

This initiative has already seen great achievements in railway construction in Malaysia, Thailand, Laos, and Indonesia and linkages with China. Also, funding for the BRI has been supported by the Chinese government and Chinese commercial banks, speeding up the outcomes of the planned infrastructure projects in the region.

Clearly, both the AMPC and the BRI will support and improve the China-ASEAN relationship that is embedded in trade and investment.

However, the BRI also raises concerns for the ASEAN states, in particular that China may make use of economic incentives to lead participating states into broader cooperation with itself, threatening the regional body’s unity. This may eventually increase Chinese economic might and strategic pathways in the region, pressuring ASEAN members to recalculate their strategic alliances and re-evaluate their relations with China and their global interests.

However, the results of the BRI so far have evidently supported ASEAN’s need for infrastructure development.

The implementation of the Belt and Road agenda requires a high level of cooperation and understanding between and among ASEAN states and China. Alongside the strict enforcement of policies and analysis of risks, this would lead to bolstered economic development and linkages between Southeast Asia and China.

April 2025

World Day for Safety and Health at Work
“Safety and health at work every day!”

Invoke Article 33 of the ILO constitution
against the military junta in Myanmar to carry out the 2021 ILO Commission of Inquiry recommendations against serious violations of Forced Labour and Freedom of Association protocols.
Accept National Unity Government
(NUG) of Myanmar.
Reject Military!
#WearMask #WashHands #Distancing #TakePicturesVideos

Time to support & empower survivors. Time to spark a global conversation. Time for #GenerationEquality to #orangetheworld!

Monthly Observances:

March – Women’s Role in History Month
April – Month of Planet Earth

Weekly Observances:
Last Week of March: Protection and Gender Fair Treatment of the Girl Child Week
Last Week of April – World Immunization Week

Daily Observances:
Mar 25 – International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transallantic Slave Trade
Mar 27– Earth Hour
Apr 21 – Civil Service Day
Apr 22 – World Earth Day
Apr 28 – World Day for Safety and Health at Work

Trade Union Solidarity Campaigns

No to Trafficking

Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!

Categories