Job creation should be next president’s top priority

Published by rudy Date posted on March 2, 2010

Economists and politicians often sing different tunes but this election season they seem to have found a common melody. They both agree that job creation should be the next administration’s top priority.

Much like the US government wants to develop direct job creation schemes with Obama’s jobs bill, which aims to reduce the 9.7-percent unemployment rate in the US, local economists and politicians also believe that joblessness here should be addressed by government.

But what should government do? Should the next administration continue deficit-spending increases to boost economic activity? Is that the long-term answer to sustainable recovery? Or does the problem call for less government activity and not more?

These are just some of the questions presidential candidates must answer in their platforms. But one thing that is unquestionable is the urgency of the situation.

According to Dr. Fernando Aldaba, former president of the Philippine Economic Society and former dean of the Ateneo de Manila University School of Economics, the Philippines needs to create 15 million jobs in five years in order to close the unemployment gap.

He based his conclusions on an eight-month study on the formulation of an industrial policy for the country by the National Competitiveness Council (NCC).

Aldaba said the country must be able to create an average of three million quality jobs a year for the next five years to be able to bridge the real unemployment gap and bring down the unemployment rate at 2 percent by the end of the fifth year.

Around 2.82 million Filipinos are totally jobless and are looking for jobs, while another 7.3 million are underemployed, those working in low-paying jobs in the services sector, Aldaba noted in his study. Then there are around 5 million returning OFWs whose contracts have ended. That totals 15.16 million Filipinos in need of jobs.

Certainly the present job creation program of government will not do. For instance, the Comprehensive Livelihood and Emergency Employment Program (CLEEP) of the National Antipoverty Commission only had an employment target of 460,280 jobs, which I am not even sure they even met last year. (CLEEP funds are sourced from the 10-percent mandatory savings of government agencies in their respective Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses budget.)

Of course, joblessness should not be the problem only of the national government. Help is vital at every level. Local governments should do their part and one thing they can do is create unemployment profiles down to the barangay level or grassroots so we can design skills programs that fit local labor markets and future demand from industries.

This would probably require funding but not much more than organization and political will. Certainly, you can put a P1.54 trillion national budget to better use.

The next administration should immediately hold a jobs forum to bring the national government, local governments, trade unions, schools, and industry councils together to find the best ways to help unemployed Filipinos find quality employment. All levels of government and the private sector need to work together to tackle joblessness and deliver tangible benefits to the country.

Only 15,382 sought nursing jobs in US

Speaking of jobs, the number of Filipinos that sought to enter America’s nursing profession plunged by 26 percent in 2009, the Trade Union Congress of the Philippines reported.

A total of 15,382 Filipino nurses took the NCLEX for the first time from January to December 2009, a decrease of 5,364 compared to the 20,746 that took the examinations in the same 12-month period in 2008. The NCLEX refers to the US National Council (of State Boards of Nursing) Licensure Examinations.

Compared to the record num-ber of 21,299 Filipino nurses that took the NCLEX for the first time (that is, excluding repeaters) in 2007, the 2009 figures were also down 28 percent, or by 5,916.

In the results of the November 2009 eligibility examinations for nurses conducted by the Philippines’ Professional Regulation Commission, only 37,527 or less than 40 percent of the 94,462 nursing graduates that took the licensure test passed—the poorest performance since 2000.

To build up the competitiveness of Filipino nurses in foreign labor markets, the TUCP recommends:

• The immediate shutdown of 152 nursing schools previously classified as “substandard” by the Commission on Higher Education;
• The annual rating of the remaining 308 nursing colleges (net of the 152 to be closed down), based on the performance of their graduates in the local licensure examinations over the last five years, and the yearly publication of the rating of every college so that buyers of nursing education may be guided accordingly;
• The provision of free intensive second foreign language training, via the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority, to nursing graduates seeking employment in non-English speaking countries such as Japan and the Middle East; and
• The strengthening of the capabilities of all state-owned hospitals, whether run by the Department of Health or by local governments, to provide superior clinical training to junior and senior nursing students. –ERNESTO F. HERRERA, MAnila Times

ernestboyherrera@yahoo.com

Month – Workers’ month

“Hot for workers rights!”

 

Continuing
Solidarity with CTU Myanmar,
trade unions around the world,
for democracy in Myanmar,
with the daily protests of
people in Myanmar against
the military coup and
continuing oppression.

 

Accept National Unity Government
(NUG) of Myanmar.
Reject Military!

#WearMask #WashHands
#Distancing
#TakePicturesVideos

Time to support & empower survivors.
Time to spark a global conversation.
Time for #GenerationEquality to #orangetheworld!
Trade Union Solidarity Campaigns
Get Email from NTUC
Article Categories